On 11-07-14 6:57 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
It's beautiful. I'd like to hold one, well any 645D, in my hand, and
shoot some shots. But really, there's no way it's remotely sensible.
645D vs K-5:
Pro:
- More pixels!
- Looks groovy (even in black)
Con:
- Thousands more
- Heavier
- Bigger
- Fewer lenses
- Less sensitive
- More pixels
People who read me on G+ know that I'm having the devil of a time
trying to get http://goo.gl/fcL8E to print with color accuracy. But
this ISO3200 K-5 APS-C shot has no trouble blowing up to 13x19 in
terms of resolution....
Now, what does anyone need a 645D for?
-Tim
Well, for one thing, I would like to print some stuff at 36" x 48" or
bigger. Macros, for example, look outstanding printed big like that. So
do landscapes (good ones anyway, not mine).
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
