It's beautiful. I'd like to hold one, well any 645D, in my hand, and shoot some shots. But really, there's no way it's remotely sensible. 645D vs K-5:
Pro: - More pixels! - Looks groovy (even in black) Con: - Thousands more - Heavier - Bigger - Fewer lenses - Less sensitive - More pixels People who read me on G+ know that I'm having the devil of a time trying to get http://goo.gl/fcL8E to print with color accuracy. But this ISO3200 K-5 APS-C shot has no trouble blowing up to 13x19 in terms of resolution.... Now, what does anyone need a 645D for? -Tim On Thu, Jul 14, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Cotty <[email protected]> wrote: > On 13/7/11, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed: > >>Same colour as my neighbours 57 chevy. I'm in. > > And like the Chevy you can sit three across in the front :) > > -- > > > Cheers, > Cotty > > > ___/\__ > || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche > ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com > _____________________________ > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
