I hope we get to see some of your photos of Hawaii!

Dan

Bruce Dayton wrote:

> Well gang,
>
> I just got back from Hawaii yesterday.  I was chaperoning a children's
> choir (including my daughter).  I took a 35mm system and my new 67
> stuff.
>
> Just a quick report.  I mostly only carried one system or the other.
> It turns out that the 67II with 55, 90 & 165 was a little lighter than
> the MZ-S/grip + Tokina 20-35/2.8, 28-70/2.8 & 80-200/2.8.  Granted,
> the 35mm had a better range covered, but the 67 was not as heavy as I
> expected it to be.  It made the hike to the top of Diamond Head crater
> on Oahu without any trouble.
>
> The usage was as follows:
> 67 - scenics, group shots, anything except quick grab shots
> 35 - quick grab shots, when 67 didn't have the right focal lengths.
>
> I ended up shooting a few more rolls of 120 film than I did of 35mm.
> In a nutshell, the 67 got plenty of use and the 35mm was not used as
> much as I had originally thought.  If anyone has any questions about
> my experience with these two systems and their comparisons, feel free
> to ask.
>
> Good to get back to 1600 email messages.
>
>  Bruce Dayton
> -
> This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
> go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
> visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

--
Daniel J. Matyola                  mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Stanley, Powers & Matyola          mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Suite203, 1170 US Highway 22 East  http://danmatyola.com
Bridgewater, NJ 08807              (908)725-3322  fax: (908)707-0399
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List.  To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .

Reply via email to