On Sep 25, 2011, at 6:24 PM, Bruce Walker <[email protected]> wrote:
> That attachment thing may be true in general, but not after you've used the > DA* 55 for a while. :-) > As you know, I've had my eye on that lens for some time now. It may be on my nearish future. :-). Cheers, Christine---ah ,Bears lost. Thank the gods the pain is over. Tough game to watch > Sorry to hear that your FA50 is deceased. > > -bmw > > On 11-09-25 7:12 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: >> Yep, I thought about replacement when it dropped--and I thought about the >> DA* 55, and I'll be happy with that lens, but you get attached to lenses >> that have served you well, don't you? I'll try repair first. Cheers, >> Christine >> >> On Sep 25, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Paul Stenquist<[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry to hear that. But it can probably be repaired.If not, replace it >>> with the DA* 55 or the FA 43 limited:-) >>> Paul >>> On Sep 25, 2011, at 6:40 PM, Christine Aguila wrote: >>> >>>> is dead. Wouldn't work while in field today. Ugh. Damn. >>>> > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. > -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
