I ryan the image through PS again.

http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=14321079&size=md

It looks a bit better, but still has problems, largely related to the
fact that it was inadvertently shot at ISO 1600.

Nevertheless, I am really puzzled at the legs and shoes of the Amigo
on the left.  bizarre indeed, and I can't explain why they look like
that.

Dan
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola



On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 5:35 PM, Charles Robinson <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 30, 2011, at 12:56, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
>> This was shot at 1600.  I was shooting another subject in the shade,
>> and when I saw these characters, I shot without changing settings, as
>> they only paused for a moment.  Bad decision.
>>
>> Their faces were in deep shadow, from the hats.  I tried to lighten
>> the image enough to show some of the facial expression, but I go a lot
>> of noise.  When I filtered out the noise, I got the soft focus on the
>> faces, and on the legs of one boy whose legs were very pale and
>> therefore blown out.
>>
>
> Sounds like you need a K5.  I know I do.  :-)
>
>  -Charles
>
> --
> Charles Robinson - [email protected]
> Minneapolis, MN
> http://charles.robinsontwins.org
> http://www.facebook.com/charles.robinson
>
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.
>

-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to