On Oct 2, 2011, at 3:30 PM, Dario Bonazza wrote:

> Bruce Walker
> 
>> I don't see any annoying blue noise of which you speak.
>> 
>> I regularly shoot my K20D @ ISO 3200. Here are just a few examples from a 
>> jazz venue notorious for low light from gelled tungsten spots:
>> 
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/5029160697
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/5029780304
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/5029162869
>> 1/90th sec, f/1.4, ISO 3200.
>> 
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/bruce_m_walker/5029786364
>> 1/8th, f/2.8, ISO 3200.
> 
> Same here. The high-ISO performance of the K20D is not bad at all, and never 
> noticed any kind of banding over here.

It wasn't banding, as just ugly noise.   Some of that may be from where I did 
most of my high iso work, in low light with tungsten lights turned down very 
low, i.e. low color temp, lots of red, boost the blue to concentrate.

> When I had a K-7 on loan, I used the K20D much often and much more happily, 
> because its noise looks much better than the "dusty" look of K-7 noise. And I 
> also like the K20D user interface a lot more than the recent "evolution" (so 
> to speak) in K-7 and K-5.

There were some things I liked better about the K20 UI.

> The K-x is noticeably better than the K20D on high-ISO settings (I'd say it 
> gains at least 1 stop, perhaps a little more), but it is worse than the K20D 
> on any other respect.

I find that metering and focus on the K-x is better. Unfortunately with the K-x 
you don't know what it focuses on.

> The further improvement in both IQ and AF of the K-5 "forced" me to go for 
> the new model, but I still miss the size and cleaner user interface of the 
> K20D.

I think that the body that felt the best in my hands was the K100, which I 
believe is very similar to the IST bodies. I *like* small camera bodies, I can 
always make it bigger with a battery grip if I want.

> 
> Dario
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to