I just tried again. Everything looks fine today - what was likely a CSS glitch has apparently been fixed. (In the mess I saw yesterday, the pages' elements were there, they were just scattered about the screen. Mostly left-justified and just hanging there on their own.)
And for the little bit of browsing around I did, I found it impressively fast to load. I don't much care for the "feature" whereby they show a shadow of the preceding and following images - just a distraction from the image you are looking at. Is that new or has it always been that way? And I would wish it knew about arrow keys to move sideways rather than needing to use the mouse and click on the itty-bitty arrow on the screen. But all in all it seems a decent interface. stan On Oct 24, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: > steve harley wrote: > >> i have now twice seen it in good order, and between those two times i've >> twice >> seen it messed up; when it's messed up all the elements there, but it seems >> as >> if the JavaScript or CSS didn't load to assemble the elements into a >> coherent >> design; back end trouble, or developers futzing with the live site (never >> heard >> of a staging server?) > > that makes sense. I've tried it on several browsers and it worked > perfectly on every one. I was probably lucky to hit the server(s) at > the right time. > > > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
