On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 1:07 PM, Bob Sullivan <[email protected]> wrote: > Frank, > Both are nice, but #2 with the ducks is better. > It's not the ducks, but the water and skyline. > The water has 2 or 3 parts to it and > the skyline is more mysterious, shrouded more in fog. > Regards, Bob S.
Funny, but it's so obvious to me that the colour shot with the ducks is the better shot, I'm surprised that there's any discussion in that regard (and there is!). ;-) For the reasons that you mention, plus a really cool comment you made when when I first posted the duck one, Bob, about the Toronto skyline emerging from the mist like the Emerald City, I really prefer that one. The calm water zig-zagging between the lightly rippled water reminds me of the yellow brick road. Anyway, thanks to all for the comments and discussion. I guess art (not that this is art, but you know what I mean) is in the eye of the beholder, eh? ;-) cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
