It's, also, been my hope that the "Pentax Team" was in place reviewing both yea and nay.contributor voting results. >From the claimed acceptance pace now being reported, I wonder about the yea v >nay ratio voting configuration. Jack
________________________________ From: Mark Roberts <[email protected]> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, November 10, 2011 10:04 AM Subject: Re: PPG editing and Voting Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: >But that raises a question: Is there still a two-tier judging system >in place? Do the peer-voted images that are accepted still have to >pass through acceptance by Pentax USA officials? I haven't seen this >explicitly stated anywhere, though I may have missed it. What made me wonder about this in the first place, by the way, is that I've been told of some images with borders/frames and/or watermarks being accepted into the gallery. I vote "no" on those myself but I suspect other voters haven't read the guidelines carefully. I just doubt that Pentax officials would overlook such a thing - that's why I wonder if it isn't all by peer voting now. That would be a shame; I alwqays thought the two-tier "popular vote than jury selection" was an excellent real-world system. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
