I'm probably missing something, but how do you know that wasn't the natural shape of the stem? Am I supposed to see a difference between the two images? If there is, it must be very subtle. Jack
From: Collin Brendemuehl <[email protected]> To: pdml <[email protected]> Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 5:45 AM Subject: Questioning the DA* 50-135 I was judging on PPG and ran across this one. It bothered me, seriously. And it reflects not one bit on the photographer and skills. The pic & the issue: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/sidebyside.html Here's the EXIF data: http://www.brendemuehl.net/images/da50135c.jpg That amount of distortion seems excessive. And it's a '*' lens none the less. (I never got any of this from the F35-105.) What do you folks think? Sincerely, Collin Brendemuehl "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" -- Jim Elliott -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
