I'm still not sure what the perceived problem is here. Lousy bokeh -- including 
vague circles in the out of focus background -- is usually more a function of 
the background than the lens. Other than lousy bokeh, lousy composition, and 
limited depth of field, I see nothing wrong with these images. 

Paul
On Nov 23, 2011, at 5:11 PM, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:

>> As it was already said by several people, I don't see anything
>> that tells me about problems with the lens.
>> I am extremely happy with my sample of that lens.
>> 
>> As for the circular appearance of something in the image, that might come
>> from e.g. zooming in/out during the exposure.
>> Or, indeed, it might come from the surroundings combined with 
>> the out-of-focus blur.
>> All those are just speculations, and I wouldn't even try to judge the
>> lens from a random photo which history you don't know (e.g. was it
>> modified?).
>> 
>> Igor
> 
> Perhaps I'm a little spooked/gun shy.  
> This is why I stopped using the 43/1.9. 
> Had two with the same type characteristic.
> It was an optical design flaw - a failure on Pentax' part.
> 
> I looked through PPG for others using this same lens and could not 
> immediately visually identify the issue on any of them.
> It seems odd that it would be random or that it would be a product
> of zoom-while-shoot as that would affect all objects in the pic.
> Perhaps it is that specific lens alone.
> 
> 
> Sincerely, 
> 
> Collin Brendemuehl 
> "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep to gain what he cannot lose" 
> -- Jim Elliott 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.


-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to