The key thing to note here is that the Q had perfectly acceptable IQ. Maybe not under all conditions, but certainly good enough to make it a real photographic tool.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2011 at 9:39 PM, William Robb <anotherdrunken...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 01/12/2011 8:27 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: >> >> A page from the Pentax Forums review of the Pentax Q. This page shows >> a comparison of images from the K7 and the Q. The K7 does better, but >> the Q is surprisingly close. >> >> http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-q/shutter-raw-jpg.html > > > I'm having a blast with my Q. Image quality at ISO 125 is excellent, good > enough for anything I'd want to print. At ISO 400 it's pretty much at the > limit of what it can give decent results to, and above that it is done if > getting a technically excellent image is your first priority. > Come to think of it, that describes my K7 to a tee. > > -- > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
