I'm curious though why PF is turning into Imaging Resources or DPReview and even reviewing non-Pentax cameras. Sure some of their readers might like or use an X10, but there are plenty of places to read about it elsewhere.
On Sun, Dec 11, 2011 at 9:49 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 11/12/2011 8:22 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote: >> >> It appears Mr. Johnson is not the only source of Q unhappiness. This >> line was the one from a recent email from Pentax Forums: >> >> "Now, in an absence of any new camera announcements from Pentax, we've >> turned to the camera that Pentax should have made: the Fuji X10." > > > They didn't like the Fuji much. Typical Pentax user base, though. Make us a > camera we don't like very much so we can trash it. > > >> >> http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/fuji-x10-review/review.html >> >> I haven't worked my way through the 11 page review yet, but evidently >> they do compare it to the Q. Favorably or not, I am yet to discover. > > > They like it a little better. > Operationally, the Fuji seems to have more restrictions than a Catholic girl > on a first date. > > -- > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- David Parsons Photography http://www.davidparsonsphoto.com Aloha Photographer Photoblog http://alohaphotog.blogspot.com/ -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
