Not too long ago, it seems, I ran into a photographer using an old,
(relatively speaking), Nikon based Kodak, {I was carrying the *ist-D),
he seemed a bit defensive that his camera was big bulky and somewhat
lower resolution than mine, but he said nothing he'd seen gave better
results at lower ISO ratings.
On 12/13/2011 1:27 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 12/12/11, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
LOL - I bet Cotty's getting his hat sauce ready. ... ;-)
Au contraire mon frere
The hat is safely in the larder!!
About time again I linked to this shot though - I swoon with a heavy
heart every time I see it -
<http://kmp.bdimitrov.de/bodies/prototypes/MZ-D.html>
If they brought that out as is with a feasible sensor and system inside,
it would not look out of place in 2012 on jot.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_____________________________
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
