Thanks. The noise is just the way it came out of the camera. That's part of the beauty of the k-5 is the quality of the noise is such that it usually isn't objectionable.
Jack Davis <[email protected]> wrote: >These put me there. Could almost hear the music. >Did you shop the noise? > >Jack > > >________________________________ >From: Larry Colen <[email protected]> >To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List <[email protected]> >Sent: Sunday, January 1, 2012 10:44 PM >Subject: Party photos > >I got a few photos at the party last night. The room was mostly lit by >a few strands of colored lights. > >I'm amused that I shoot at bars that have colored gels on the lights, >and the photos just end up looking crappy, I go to a house party, they >just throw a few strings of lights out, and they make for some cool and >interesting colors in the photos. It was tough as all get out to >photograph, too dark for autofocus, the light would change a lot >depending on direction, and I couldn't just put the camera on auto >exposure or it would totally blow out the dominant channel. These were >all shot with the K-5 and FA31, usually at f/1.8, ISO 8000-12,800 and >1/20-1/60, and manually focused as much by luck as by skill. >Of course the photos a friend specifically requested (552 & 576) are >of dubious sharpness. > >http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157628675276189/ >or for the exif >http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157628675276189/ > >I had a few people expressing surprise at my getting photos without >using a flash. It's a situation where it's really hard to beat the >K-5. The only cameras with better sensors for low light, have bigger >sensors, which means less depth of field for the angle of view (though >the FA31 with a full frame version of the K-5 would be hard to beat), >and none of them have SR on anything faster than f/2.8 (unless the 645D >will outperform the K-5 at high ISO in stupid low light and there is >fast glass available for it). > >-- >Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
