On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> wrote: I can't stand the way the 16-50mm DA* ejaculates ; it's so vulgar, though I do recognize it takes nice pictures. It's so different than the DA* 50-135mm, which maintains its lovely shape as you zoom in and out.
Somehow, I didn't realize this was a "feature" of the 16-50... having the refined 50-135, it never occurred to me that its sibling would be so crude. And I've been saving for the 16-50 as my next acquisition. This revelation is enough to make me reconsider. Ick. -c -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
