Is that a Pentax in your pocket or are you happy to see me? (Someone had to say this.)
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Larry Colen <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Jan 21, 2012, at 7:16 AM, Christine Nielsen wrote: > >> On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 2:20 AM, Christine Aguila <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> I can't stand the way the 16-50mm DA* ejaculates ; it's so vulgar, >> though I do recognize it takes nice pictures. It's so different than >> the DA* 50-135mm, which maintains its lovely shape as you zoom in and >> out. >> >> Somehow, I didn't realize this was a "feature" of the 16-50... having >> the refined 50-135, it never occurred to me that its sibling would be >> so crude. And I've been saving for the 16-50 as my next acquisition. >> This revelation is enough to make me reconsider. Ick. > > And people wonder why I like to be the one behind the camera. > > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
