Mark, I can't do a K-5 photo at full resolution 100% JPEG quality and fit the maximum file size for submitting to the annual. That means I need to either make it smaller in pixels, or compress it more in JPEG quality.
I could do full resolution at about 80% quality or about 3200x2800 at 100% quality. Which works better for you? Or is there some ideal resolution where it won't need to be resized based on dpi and nominal picture size? It looks like the vertical pictures are 2000 pixels tall and the horizontal are 2500 wide (based on 300dpi). So that implies that if we set those limits in lightroom as the max size, then you won't need to downsize. Would there be any advantage to pushing them any larger? -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
