Still, we only have to remember the reaction to the K-01 to understand why they do it. Making the K=01 look like a smaller version of a Spotmatic would have been a much better design choice form a sales POV than the what they did.
As mentioned, fabulous spell checker miscue! On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 7:49 AM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > That's more like what the k-01 should be. Still it's mostly ascetics that > makes it an "OM-D" It has no connection to the OM system in any real way. > > > On 2/8/2012 3:44 AM, Cotty wrote: >> >> <http://www.dpreview.com/previews/olympusem5/> >> >> Very cool. >> >> It's a viewfinder Jim but not as we know it.... >> >> >> -- >> >> >> Cheers, >> Cotty >> >> >> ___/\__ >> || (O) | People, Places, Pastiche >> ---------- http://www.cottysnaps.com >> _____________________________ >> >> >> > > > -- > Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid > a lengthily search. > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
