While we're begin nostalgic, here' the MX: http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-film-slr-discussion/61218-pentax-mx.html
I think that would make a great retro digital body. Look how small it is compared to the k1000: http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pentax_MX Oly will make a bunch of money with that new OM-G body and Pentax could have done the same. The trick is no to mess with the basics by sticking in random modern styling elements. Cotty and I would buy it. On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > Brian is right: > > http://camerapedia.wikia.com/wiki/Pentax_K2 > > (It's not that I doubted you, Brian; I just didn't believe you.) > > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Matthew Hunt <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious. >>> >>> The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space >>> available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras. >> >> At least they spelled it right. In contrast to whoever wrote item #4 >> in the lens announcement. >> >> http://www.pentax.jp/english/news/announce/20120208.html >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
