We've got a pretty good idea how it preforms photographically, the
sensor is in the same family as the K5 the electronic guts of the beast
is in all probability a streamlined version of the K5. It will make
photographs that will be compariable to the K5. Frame rate is
5fps.about like the K7 So aside from the lack of a viewfinder we know
it will preform like a K5. If it had a decent EVF it would be worthy of
consideration as a complementary body used with a K5 or K7. We know,
more or less, that long lenses used with it will be problematic. Sp
there's little enough to discuss except it's aesthetics.
On 2/10/2012 9:49 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
Yeah, but how does it perform photographically?
-----Original Message-----
From: William Robb<[email protected]>
Sent: Feb 10, 2012 8:40 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List<[email protected]>
Subject: Re: What Bugs Me Most about the K-01 Aesthetics
On 10/02/2012 12:01 PM, Tom C wrote:
It's the weird type styles they used on the body. It looks atrocious.
The PENTAX badge looks squished vertically to make it fit in the space
available. Compare it to the PENTAX on the K-5 or other cameras.
The K-01 label mixes two type styles, and what's up with the goofy 'K'?
I'm more bothered by it looking like a pile of Lego blocks...
--
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
