the smc k135/2.5 ( not the takumar 135/2.5) is a killer sharp lens. jco -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Subash Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:17 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: What would you do with a 50 1.2
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:59:50 -0500 "P. J. Alling" <[email protected]> wrote: > The K 35mm f3.5, (a bitch to focus in dim light even on the view > finders it was designed for), extremely sharp with creamy bokeh. The > K version of the 135mm f3.5 very sharp a bit bulky, (twice as long > as the M version), but available for less than 50 bucks. The M200mm > f4.0 also a bargain but also a very good lens. These were all from > Pentax's second or third tier of lenses but Pentax generally saved > money on speed but optical quality was always top notch. PJ, any idea what's the k135/2.5 is like? just came across one in very good shape for about $50. i like k lenses so will most probably buy it anyway but it'd be nice to know :) thanks, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
