Hey, it's just an extension of the hunter gatherer mentality, the author
likes to augment his diet with wild foods therefor it's all right to
augment his web site with photographs of wild foods no matter the
source. You just have to understand where he's comin' from.
On 2/28/2012 4:31 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Somehow I came across this article while Googling:
http://www.reidandfriends.com.au/2012/02/23/bush-tucker-babe/
It's not of much interest to anyone here (unless, like me, you're
interested in Australian flora), but the second image caught my eye -
especially as it's mine!
It's not a great image by any means (it was used to illustrate an
article on a web site I maintain).
Here's a comment I posted....
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
"Hi
Interesting article. More so for me when I note you have used my Pig
Face photo (it’s Carpobrotus by the way, not Carpobrutus. And it’s
rossii not glaucescens.
Here’s the link to the original source.
http://anpsa.org.au/c-ros.html
Oh – and our copyright info:
http://anpsa.org.au/copy.html
Cheers
Brian
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
The comment has been "awaiting moderation" since last Sunday.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
