On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 2:06 PM, Bob W <[email protected]> wrote: > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of > > Bruce Walker > > > > Thanks, Bob. > > > > On the tats: you'll see that anachronisms abound in this shoot! We had > > a 1918 typewriter, 1940's pincurls, 1950's vinyl chair, 1970's TV > > servicing textbook, 2000's tattoos ... > > > > Vintage is a state of mind. :) > > > > That makes it postmodern, not vintage. It's a good photo, but she still > has the price tag on the sole of her shoe. > > B
Noticed that price tag! It's high on my list of retouch items. :) This is a straight JPEG xversion from the out-of-camera RAW; not even sharpened. It's not easily visible at this image size, but the model also experienced a wardrobe malfunction of the J. Jackson type that I'll retouch out. Postmodern; sure, I'll go with that. The shots are largely a modern reinterpretation of a painted style anyhow. There is a series of interesting shots floating around that Gil Elvgren took of live models from which he created his pinups. You can see where he 'shopped-in background and props. http://elvgrenpinup.com/Elvgren_models.html Thanks for looking and commenting, Bob. -- -bmw -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
