On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 9:43 AM, John Sessoms <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Larry Colen > >> On Mar 8, 2012, at 8:43 AM, mike wilson wrote: >> >>> On 05/03/2012 15:45, David Parsons wrote: >>>> >>>> That defeats the purpose of using Google products in the first place. >>>> I use the history to find websites or pages that I may want to refer >>>> back to that I may not have bookmarked. And since it's a web based >>>> service, it works on all computers that I've logged onto. >>> >>> It defeats (to some extent) Google using information it gathers from and >>> about me for its own purposes, when I use some of their products. At best >>> Google (and some other companies) is like one of those friends that you see >>> infrequently and, when you do, they try to sell you something or get you to >>> invest in some just-this-side-of-legal scheme. As such, I will either not >>> use those products or exercise this right. >>> >>> I'm sure Google is orders of magnitude more important to me than I am to >>> it but, if push came to shove, I could manage perfectly well without it. >> >> >> Just out of curiosity, what harm comes to you from Google, or anyone else, >> collecting this information? > > > Why do you want to know?
To serve you better. Now just lie down and relax on the nice silver "couch". > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
