Until I try the damn thing, this is still my opinion: http://www.camera-enthusiast.com/news/photo-technique/form-over-function-or-why-the-pentax-k-01-was-a-bad-idea/
For those who don't want to read, it's about the opposite of Mark's :-) Cheers. —M. \/\/o/\/\ --> http://WorldOfMiserere.com http://EnticingTheLight.com A Quest for Photographic Enlightenment On 13 March 2012 14:46, Larry Colen <l...@red4est.com> wrote: > > http://www.pentaxforums.com/reviews/pentax-k-01-review/ > > > Short form: > Not for everyone, or every situation, but great for where it works > Raw performance equivalent to K-5 > Much improved video > AF mostly works > Excellent upgrade camera for someone moving up from a compact point and shoot > Not ideal for long lenses, but excellent with smaller lenses for a walkaround > camera. > > -- > Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
