> > Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk. > > I think I have a keeper in this set, but I'm not sure which one it is, > 191, 192, or 194. They are three slightly different treatments of the > same subject, and there are things that I like about each of them: > > http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629349397638/ > > Comments and suggestions on which is the keeper and why, or how to > improve them are appreciated. > > -- > Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est >
None of them particularly stand out to me. The waves coming in are probably the nicest of the set, but each of those has a flaw. The best of them is probably LRC46198 but that is spoiled by the intrusion into the lower left/centre of the frame. LRC46237 is also quite nice, but rather flat. Put them aside for a month then look at them again. It's the sort of subject matter that demands either a scientific approach, or a fine arts approach (at which point it risks becoming cliched). The composition, lighting and rendering aren't strong enough for them to be fine art. B -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
