On Apr 1, 2012, at 2:34 AM, Bob W wrote: >> >> Here are my slightly less frivolous photos from the photo walk. >> >> I think I have a keeper in this set, but I'm not sure which one it is, >> 191, 192, or 194. They are three slightly different treatments of the >> same subject, and there are things that I like about each of them: >> >> http://www.flickriver.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157629349397638/ >> >> Comments and suggestions on which is the keeper and why, or how to >> improve them are appreciated. >> >> -- >> Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est >> >
> None of them particularly stand out to me. For what it's worth, it was specifically 191, 192 and 194 that I was asking about. > The waves coming in are probably > the nicest of the set, but each of those has a flaw. The best of them is > probably LRC46198 but that is spoiled by the intrusion into the lower > left/centre of the frame. > > LRC46237 is also quite nice, but rather flat. I tried amping it up a bit with the curves. > > Put them aside for a month then look at them again. It's the sort of subject > matter that demands either a scientific approach, or a fine arts approach > (at which point it risks becoming cliched). The composition, lighting and > rendering aren't strong enough for them to be fine art. Thanks for the feedback. -- Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
