> John Sessoms wrote: > > Well, if they end up making a profit off the Q and the K-01, I don't > suppose it's a waste of money, although neither of them fits my needs. > > I've been sort of aiming towards the "K-3" being my next Pentax camera, > whether it's FF or not. I'm not willing to pay $3K for another APS-C > body, but I would for full frame. It would hurt, but I'd do it.
At that point I'd just sell all my Pentax gear, buy a D800/E and start over. Watch everyone complain if/when there's a Pentax FF that now all the money they spent on the APS-C lenses reduces the resolution when put on a FF body. Many will have to buy new lenses, so at that point, why Pentax? Pentax has taken too long for me to conceivably buy into a FF system from them. Even a $2000 body at 24MP would make me think long and hard on spending on Pentax vs. taking my business elsewhere. Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
