Now that you mention it, I have far more FA than DA lenses. Of course, i wouldn't spend $2500 on any camera.
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:02 PM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > From: Tom C > > >>> John Sessoms wrote: >>> >>> Well, if they end up making a profit off the Q and the K-01, I don't >>> suppose it's a waste of money, although neither of them fits my needs. >>> >>> I've been sort of aiming towards the "K-3" being my next Pentax camera, >>> whether it's FF or not. I'm not willing to pay $3K for another APS-C >>> body, but I would for full frame. It would hurt, but I'd do it. >> >> At that point I'd just sell all my Pentax gear, buy a D800/E and start >> over. Watch everyone complain if/when there's a Pentax FF that now all >> the money they spent on the APS-C lenses reduces the resolution when >> put on a FF body. Many will have to buy new lenses, so at that point, >> why Pentax? >> >> Pentax has taken too long for me to conceivably buy into a FF system >> from them. Even a $2000 body at 24MP would make me think long and hard >> on spending on Pentax vs. taking my business elsewhere. > > > Yeah, a big investment in APS-C lenses would be a problem, but mostly I've > been getting by using film lenses. The only APS-C lenses I have are the > 18-55 kit lens that came with the K-20D & a couple of Sigmas (30mm f/1.4 & > 10-20 zoom). > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > PDML@pdml.net > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
