I hate to rain on the parade, but I don't see anything wrong. Would it be better to store the additional supplies outside the restroom, so somebody who was restocking the toilet roll holder had to go outside to a cupboard somewhere (almost certainly without washing his/her hands first)?
It moght not be pretty (a cover on the rack wouldn't hurt), but I'd rather eat in that restaurant than in a restaurant which stored spare toliet rolls in the same cupboard as the napkins. On Thu, Apr 19, 2012 at 04:27:26PM -0400, [email protected] wrote: > I guess someone could always wipe out their supply. > > > Kenneth Waller > http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Daniel J. Matyola" > <[email protected]> > Subject: PESO: Would you eat at this restaurant? > > > >http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15563345 > > > >They seem to be quite determined to ensure that an adequate supply of > >toilet paper is on hand in the rest room. [In fact, there is an > >additional roll, on a floor stand not visible in this image. > > > >Comments , criticisms, abuse and rants are all welcome. > > > >Dan Matyola > >http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
