I see what you mean about the poles and over compensating... I think I
did the second, 1st then went back to the first one as a better choice.
And Tim pointed out "visual junk" that I couldnt even see in the lower
left . hmmm..
I like Paul's reason for liking the first better. Fascinating who
prefers which... and makes me want to revisit it - but I also don't
want to do too much adjustment in PS -- kinda cheating for this kind
of stuff.
ann
On 4/27/2012 13:55, John Sessoms wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele
I've been going back and forth with this since I got back from Boston..
Anyone have strong feelings about which of these is "better" ?
The first is as shot, the second is adjusted, as you see, to straighten
it but that necessitated a different crop.
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/2012-and-all-that/21847075_D88Ngw/1/1784705589_tGGrqst/Large
http://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/Random-stuff/2607384_ZTHNRm/1/1784699368_Jr32VmB/Large
Your waffling photog
ann
Since the black pole in the center (surveillance camera?) is a strong
vertical element, I prefer it to be straight up and down. The second,
adjusted shot is the better of the two, but it looks like you've
over-compensated in straightening the image and have the pole leaning a
bit to the left now.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
