Bill, Seems to me the lame part is not simply including the mother. Our family photos include mom with the kids. Regards, Bob S.
On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 3:44 PM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > On 06/05/2012 2:12 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote: >> >> I guess, but kind of a lame idea... > > > When exposure were measured in tens of minutes, photographers had to do > whatever they could to ensure kids kept still. For adults there were all > sorts of contraptions (head clamps and the like) to keep subjects from > moving for the requited time. > > >> >> On Sun, May 6, 2012 at 9:21 AM, Daniel J. Matyola<[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> >>> A fascinating technique in portrait photography: >>> >>> http://www.retronaut.co/2011/10/the-invisible-mother/ >>> >>> Dan Matyola >>> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola >>> >>> -- >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >>> follow the directions. >> >> > > > -- > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
