We all have opinions on such things. Many things are immoral, or despicable, or not entirely kosher and should be condemned but are not necessarily illegal. Now, I may be wrong. Perhaps the law does call this theft. Last I heard links were legal. Both Boz and ebay agree that they don't like it (and I don't like it either). You are right, that only their opinions count here, nevertheless at least 30 folks (including you) have expressed their opinions. You just don't happen to like mine.
Regards, Bob... -------------------- "Let us contemplate our forefathers, and posterity, and resolve to maintain the rights bequeathed to us from the former, for the sake of the latter. The necessity of the times, more than ever, calls for our utmost circumspection, deliberation, fortitude, and perseverance. Let us remember that 'if we suffer tamely a lawless attack upon our liberty, we encourage it, and involve others in our doom.' It is a very serious consideration that millions yet unborn may be the miserable sharers of the event." - Samuel Adams, 1771 From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Bob Blakely wrote: > > > He has not stolen any images. He has merely > > linked to images. > > I would say that he has not stolen any *files*, but that he has stolen an > image insofar as I understand the definitions of "stealing" and "image". > Both Boz and eBay agree on this as far as I can tell and they are the ones > whose opinions matter in this case. - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
