On Jun 19, 2012, at 12:23 PM, Igor Roshchin wrote:

> 
> Larry,
> 
> 1. Regarding the glare, - I remember reading somewhere (maybe even from
> a source posted here, on PDML) an advaice that with DSLRs the sunshades
> should be used at [almost] all times. 
> I don't remember the reasoning, however.
> In any case, the newer lenses are designed (or coated?) to reduce the 
> flare that can be produced due to high reflectance of the matrix. 
> I am not sure if that might be the culprit here. Obviously, A*200 does 
> not have that in its design/coating.

Yesterday I tried making an enhanced lens hood, one with a narrower field of 
view, that would do a better job of shading the lens.  
I tested it and couldn't get that nasty glare either with, or without the extra 
hood.  So, I'm puzzled.  It might only be so obvious with a really, really dark 
background.

> 
> 2. I like several photos from this set (mostly portraits and group
> photos).
> I don't care much for the trombone one - it might be somewhat
> mesmerizing but it is too mechanistic for me personally.

That's what happens when you turn the dial to 11, some people love it, others 
hate it.

> 
> I hope you don't mind me sharing my rather critical view on some of
> other photos below.

Feedback is always appreciated.

> Continuing the idea that I mentioned to you in response to the book
> photos, - I would leave out these photos:
> 20120617-LRC51609.jpg
> 20120617-LRC51549.jpg
> and probably (it's close to the border-line here)
> 20120617-LRC51548.jpg .
> For the first two, I don't appreciate the composition, 
> for the last one, - the combination: composition (which can be fixed 
> partially, - by cropping), and a combination of the facial expression 
> with the grain.  
> The composition/crop of 20120616-LRC51257.jpg is not my favorite either.

I'm very new to getting photos of the audience.  The bands that I usually shoot 
are either playing for dancers, or don't have much of an audience (jam nights 
at the local dive bar).  I might like them as much for their novelty in my 
collection as anything else.

> 
> 3. After glancing over the set first time, I thought that you can use
> a mix of B&W and color on one of the shots...
> (I even pulled mine as an example:
> http://42graphy.komkon.org/swing/camphollywood-2007/Artsy/index.html -
> sorry, it requires flash plugin)
> And then I found that you did that in the first photo,
> 20120616-LRC51164.jpg 

Great minds think alike.

> 
> 4. Speaking of that first photo, - even though it is interesting for the
> reason discussed in 3 above, the composition seems to be rather
> disjointed. I would consider splitting this photo into two.
> The right side, cut just to left of the orange light or to the right
> (or possibly even through the light?)
> is more interesting. The left one might not stand on its own.

http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/7403887422/


> 
> Igor
> 
> 
> On 18/06/2012 3:06 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
>> A friend and I went to see a couple of bands at a local club last
>> night.  I managed to get a few decent photos.
>> 
>> The lighting was a bit challenging.  In this shot, rather than trying
>> to bring it under control, I went the other way and used lightroom's
>> clarity, vibrance etc. to push it right over the top:
>> 
>> http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/7391897310
>> 
>> For them that are interested, here's the rest of the set:
>> http://www.fluidr.com/photos/ellarsee/sets/72157630171300160/
>> 
>> On some of them I tried to tame the lighting in lightroom, in others I
>> went with it, though not so radically as above.
>> 
>> Comments, and helpful suggestions, as always, are appreciated.
>> 
>> I notice that I was having a fair amount of difficulty with flare on
>> the A*200, even when stage lights weren't in the field of view.  I may
>> need to make something like a lens cap for the sunshade, that has a
>> rectangle cut out to block anything not in the field of view.
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> [email protected]
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
> the directions.

--
Larry Colen [email protected] sent from i4est





-- 
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow 
the directions.

Reply via email to