>Larry Colen wrote: > >>Although I'm beginning to suspect that as resolution increases, >>diffraction and lens issues will soon render anti-aliasing as >>unneeded. If we're sampling at twice the diffraction limit, or >>the lenses resolution, do we really need an AA filter? > > >Probably why the Pentax Q doesn't have an anti-aliasing filter: With >14 megapixels in a sensor that small the lens itself is probably the >AA filter. >
I agree, and because of this I believe that we still will see an increase in the number of pixels on dslrs. You don't have to think about moire if you have sufficient spacial oversampling, so you can reduce the processing and AA-filters. People expectig more resolution will be disappointed. DagT -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
