I can see the real diffraction limits at f4 on the Q. I really need 2.8 or lower before it's hard to see.
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Mark Roberts <[email protected]> wrote: > Larry Colen wrote: > >>Although I'm beginning to suspect that as resolution increases, >>diffraction and lens issues will soon render anti-aliasing as >>unneeded. If we're sampling at twice the diffraction limit, or >>the lenses resolution, do we really need an AA filter? > > > Probably why the Pentax Q doesn't have an anti-aliasing filter: With > 14 megapixels in a sensor that small the lens itself is probably the > AA filter. > > -- > Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia > www.robertstech.com > > > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
