That is annoying. I have a stupid large number of photos to process, even by my standards, and I was considering doing the first round of rating on my XP box, because with internal drives, loading the photos should, in theory, go faster.
Igor Roshchin <[email protected]> wrote: > >I just discovered that LR4 will not install on WinXP. >What a bummer! It means it won't install on my current desktop, and >it won't install on my wife's netbook. > >But what I was pissed off much more is the spin that some people gave >on >this decision. One of them is Mr. Scott Kelby, editor and publisher of > >Photoshop User Magazine: >http://scottkelby.com/2012/lightroom-4-and-leaving-the-past-behind/ > >I understand what drives such decisions from the technical side. I just > >hate when people are trying to tell me that it is for my own benefit. >Let me decide what is, and what is not... >Afterall, we have different incentives. > >Oh, well... > >Igor > > > >-- >PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >[email protected] >http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >follow the directions. -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
