Slightly faster film advance? On Tue, Jul 10, 2012 at 4:08 PM, steve harley <[email protected]> wrote: > on 2012-07-09 24:02 Martin Trautmann wrote > >> On 12-05-22 0:38, Darren Addy wrote: >>> >>> A quick comparison of the K-5 specs with the K-30 seems to show only >>> minor(?) differences. >> >> >> So why buy the two years younger K-30 when the K-5 actually does cost >> the same money? > > > K-5 is a bit cheaper in US, depending where you buy; there were a bunch with > warranty on eBay for $800 recently > > i was consider the comparison and found the choice isn't simple — it comes > down to one's personal weighting of several factors > > the factors i focused on: > > K30: lighter, improves AF, has focus-peaking, can use AA batteries, and has > some better video capabilities > > K-5: more dynamic range, better battery life, a top display panel, a quieter > shutter, DOF-preview at the shutter button, slightly faster film advance, > HDMI output, a stronger body, and a better dust removing sensor shake > > there are a few other differences, and it really depends what matters more > to you; i weighted it for my own preferences and it came more than 2-1 in > favor of K-5 without considering price > > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions.
-- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
