Heck, I didn't do any in depth comparison, the K5 at first glance looks
more like a LX.
On 7/10/2012 4:08 PM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-07-09 24:02 Martin Trautmann wrote
On 12-05-22 0:38, Darren Addy wrote:
A quick comparison of the K-5 specs with the K-30 seems to show only
minor(?) differences.
So why buy the two years younger K-30 when the K-5 actually does cost
the same money?
K-5 is a bit cheaper in US, depending where you buy; there were a
bunch with warranty on eBay for $800 recently
i was consider the comparison and found the choice isn't simple — it
comes down to one's personal weighting of several factors
the factors i focused on:
K30: lighter, improves AF, has focus-peaking, can use AA batteries,
and has some better video capabilities
K-5: more dynamic range, better battery life, a top display panel, a
quieter shutter, DOF-preview at the shutter button, slightly faster
film advance, HDMI output, a stronger body, and a better dust removing
sensor shake
there are a few other differences, and it really depends what matters
more to you; i weighted it for my own preferences and it came more
than 2-1 in favor of K-5 without considering price
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
