Artur Led�chowski wrote > -----Original Message----- > Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 2:10 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: 28-70 vs 24-90 vs 28-105 > > I'd avoid buying the 28-105, since, of course if i'm > not mistaken, this is the lens based on the Tamron > construction. I don't mean it's crap - no, it's good too > (has AL, IF and bayonet mount lens hood), but using the > aperture ring is really a pain in the butt - it's very small > and too hard to reach and operate comfortably
You ARE mistaken, as the lens probably designed by Tamron is FA 28-105/4-5.6 [IF], but the question was about FA 28-105/3.2-4.5 AL [IF], that has design similar to the 24-90 and looks the same out. This lens is built better than 27-70/4 IMHO, all rings moves smoothly, AF is fast and not loud. But I can say nothing about its optical quality, as I have only playing with it in the shop. Edward - This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe, go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
