On 8/19/12 20:11, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 8/19/12 17:16, Toralf Lund wrote:
On 8/19/12 16:40, frank theriault wrote:
Interesting shots, but they are extremely muddy looking to me. Maybe
old out of date film but surely something could be done in PS after
scanning?
I'm not sure I understand exactly what you mean by "muddy".
I did have a stab at an alternative rendering, though, or in one of
the cases, two different ones:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-15b
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-17b
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-20b
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-20c
Actually, there is no "20c", but I do have
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-17c
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-35b
These are actually done much quicker, and with adjustments more like
my "standard" ones.
- Toralf
I must admit, though, that I've never managed to get any scans from
B&W negatives that aren't somewhat flat and dull-looking at first. I
thought I did a reasonable processing job on these, but perhaps I'm a
poor judge of what looks right.
- Toralf
cheers,
frank
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Toralf Lund<[email protected]> wrote:
Last week I did some walking around in my area, with a '90s camera
and a bit
of T-Max 100. Here is some of what I brought back:
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-15
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-17
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-20
http://www.toralf.net/bilde.php?navn=2012-8-35
What do you say?
- Toralf
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
