A much cheaper Q makes more sense. It was a really great camera to have during my trip to Philly. It was just easy to carry and fun to use.
On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: > Sorry I'm feeling prankish today so take what I say in that light. :) > >> I guess it >> confuses me that they make the Q and K-01. > > Yes that confuses me also. > >> I really don't know why they would engineer a 4-105mm for a Q-sized >> sensor. > > I don't know why they would engineer a Q. I'm sure it takes fine > images for it's size but it was doomed from the start up against much > larger sensor IC lens cameras at a lower price. > >> If nothing else, this gives me greater hope that Q development is >> alive and well (not abandoned). > > If Pentax were to be developing a Q replacement instead of a FF it > would be shocking. > > :) > > Tom C. > >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> >> >> End of PDML Digest, Vol 76, Issue 159 >> ************************************* > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
