Here's a CNET release about the X. The notable thing is the price at $280. That's a good price for this kind of camera.
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:47 PM, Steven Desjardins <[email protected]> wrote: > A much cheaper Q makes more sense. It was a really great camera to > have during my trip to Philly. It was just easy to carry and fun to > use. > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 12:17 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: >> Sorry I'm feeling prankish today so take what I say in that light. :) >> >>> I guess it >>> confuses me that they make the Q and K-01. >> >> Yes that confuses me also. >> >>> I really don't know why they would engineer a 4-105mm for a Q-sized >>> sensor. >> >> I don't know why they would engineer a Q. I'm sure it takes fine >> images for it's size but it was doomed from the start up against much >> larger sensor IC lens cameras at a lower price. >> >>> If nothing else, this gives me greater hope that Q development is >>> alive and well (not abandoned). >> >> If Pentax were to be developing a Q replacement instead of a FF it >> would be shocking. >> >> :) >> >> Tom C. >> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >>> [email protected] >>> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >>> >>> >>> End of PDML Digest, Vol 76, Issue 159 >>> ************************************* >> >> -- >> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List >> [email protected] >> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net >> to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and >> follow the directions. > > > > -- > Steve Desjardins -- Steve Desjardins -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
