That is nonsense Darren, and this case proves it. When the iPhone first came out it was unique. All the competitors looked different from the iPhone, and different from each other.
The iPhone (created by a corporation) was better than the others. The proof of this is that all the other phones how look just like the iPhone. Instead of trying to develop something different and better, they simply copied the iPhone. Now, people are surprised that the courts are finding that to be in violation of Apple's rights under the patent law? DUH! Dan Matyola http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 10:52 PM, John Sessoms <jsessoms...@nc.rr.com> wrote: > From: Darren Addy > > Corporations don't create intellectual property. They find something > pre-existing that no one else thought to patent & then sue everyone who is > already using it. And you end up paying higher prices to cover the cost of > litigation. > > Patents don't reward innovators. That's so 230 years ago. Now patents reward > corporate lawyers & Wall Street banksters. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
