I didn't realize I made a funny. Every response to this post is a re-queue. :)
Tom C. On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:53 PM, Tom C <[email protected]> wrote: >> From: William Robb <[email protected]> >> >> Imagewise, the Q gives theK20 a run. >> I realize the K20 isn't considered a paragon of image quality, but the Q >> is teeny and it's way faster than any P&S I've tried. >> Until my wife kidnapped mine, it was my carry all the time camera. >> For general snapshots it's more than adequate, and being able to mount a >> 35mm format lens on it and having a super duper telephoto is kinda cool. >> Did you see the moon shot I posted a while back? You can almost see >> Apollo 16's LEM in it. >> >> -- >> >> William Robb > > That's truly sad, in a way, and great, if it can compete with a K20D. > At all image sizes/ISO's? > > For a simple carry-about I would no doubt agree. > > Yes I saw the moon shot and was mightily impressed! > > I'm just saying... well you of all people know what I'm saying. > > I'm sure it's a fun little system, and infinitely better and more > useful than the Pentax 110 of yore. > > Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
