That would be hard to do all the Canon users around here seem to drag
Bigmas with them. If size matter they're KING!
On 9/2/2012 9:42 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
It mentions "disassembling or collapse" for easier transport. Maybe
it's extra long so you can feel superior among your Canon-user
friends.
On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 10:56 PM, J.C. O'Connell <hifis...@gate.net> wrote:
the article stated that its NOT compact for a 560mm,
its more of a long focus design to improve performance
and reduce cost but its BIG.
-----------------
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-----------------
-----Original Message-----
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Mark
C
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2012 10:35 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Anyone in the market for a 560 mm?
Depends on the price, of course, but I'd probably bite on it. I have the
A* 400 f 2.8 but it is so fricking big that I never use it. A smaller,
more compact 560mm would be great. As an f 5.6 lens, though, it has to
be totally sharp wide open.
Mark
On 9/1/2012 6:30 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
Apparently one is coming.
http://photorumors.com/2012/08/31/pentax-da-560mm-f5-6-lens-to-be-announced-
at-photokina/
Pity that I'd probably need to sell the car to afford one.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
