The page is gone ... :) On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:37 AM, P. J. Alling <[email protected]> wrote: > Well just to rub some glass in the wound lets see how many of this mook's > predictions came true. > > Everywhere you see 0/1 you should supply a loud buzzer sound a la family > feud when a wrong guess is made. > > http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-9-things-that-pentax-is-to-be.htm > > K300 he said close to 100% Pentax said 0/1 > > K 5n he said close to 100% Pentax said K5II/K5IIs 2/1 > > K3/K3s he said close to 100% Pentax said 0/1 > > 645Dn/D645II he said close to 100% Pentax said 0/1 > > DA 18-200/3.5-5.6 WR DC He said close to 90% Pentax said SMC Pentax-DA > 18-270mm F3.5-6.3 ED SDM (close but no cigar, score IMNSHO Blind Pig Acorn) > > DA560/5.6 he said 90% Pentax said HD Pentax-DA 560mm F5.6 ED AW DC (score > close but no cigar, we all knew this was coming months ago and he was almost > completely wrong about every detail not already known). > > DFA645 90/2.8 (for portraiture) He said 90% Pentax said HD Pentax-D FA 645 > 90mm F2.8 ED AW SR Macro (so for portraiture, not so much score IMNSHO Blind > Pig Acorn) > > AF600FGZ He said 80% Pentax said 0/1 > > O-GPS2 He said 75% Pentax said 0/1 > > About the new Q products not a word. > > > Final score 4 for 9, or an overall rating of blind pig. > > Yes, I know it's mean but then he deserves it. > > > -- > Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a > lengthly search. > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and > follow the directions.
-- Bong Manayon http://bong.manayon.net -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
