Oh. That's all right I have screen shots. I'll have to stitch them
together and post them somewhere.
On 9/10/2012 9:44 PM, Bong Manayon wrote:
The page is gone ... :)
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 9:37 AM, P. J. Alling
<[email protected]> wrote:
Well just to rub some glass in the wound lets see how many of this mook's
predictions came true.
Everywhere you see 0/1 you should supply a loud buzzer sound a la family
feud when a wrong guess is made.
http://ricehigh.blogspot.com/2012/09/the-9-things-that-pentax-is-to-be.htm
K300 he said close to 100% Pentax said 0/1
K 5n he said close to 100% Pentax said K5II/K5IIs 2/1
K3/K3s he said close to 100% Pentax said 0/1
645Dn/D645II he said close to 100% Pentax said 0/1
DA 18-200/3.5-5.6 WR DC He said close to 90% Pentax said SMC Pentax-DA
18-270mm F3.5-6.3 ED SDM (close but no cigar, score IMNSHO Blind Pig Acorn)
DA560/5.6 he said 90% Pentax said HD Pentax-DA 560mm F5.6 ED AW DC (score
close but no cigar, we all knew this was coming months ago and he was almost
completely wrong about every detail not already known).
DFA645 90/2.8 (for portraiture) He said 90% Pentax said HD Pentax-D FA 645
90mm F2.8 ED AW SR Macro (so for portraiture, not so much score IMNSHO Blind
Pig Acorn)
AF600FGZ He said 80% Pentax said 0/1
O-GPS2 He said 75% Pentax said 0/1
About the new Q products not a word.
Final score 4 for 9, or an overall rating of blind pig.
Yes, I know it's mean but then he deserves it.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
follow the directions.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
[email protected]
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
