what do you mean? 43 will be very similar to 31 now, and 77 to 43.
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:15 AM, William Robb <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 14/09/2012 6:34 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote: >> >> I doubt that a lack of a competitive 24 x 36 camera will lead to immediate >> defections over the holiday buying season, although it might cost Pentax >> some sales to impressionable newbies. The Nikon certainly wouldn't interest >> me if it couldn't equal the low-light performance of the K-5. If the K-5 II >> matches the noise performance of the K-5 with much better autofocus, it will >> get some excellent reviews, and it will sell. Their are already some >> preliminary whispers of praise for the filter-free version. Pentaxians have >> fixated on frame dimension because they don't have a big one. I suspect >> that much of the rest of the world doesn't care. >> > > A lot of people are really fixated on the 24x36 format, and do sell one brand > for another based on that feature. > I want FF for the viewfinder, but I will mostly stop using some very nice > lenses. I won't have much use for my 31, 43 and 77, for example. > > -- > > William Robb > > > -- > PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List > [email protected] > http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net > to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow > the directions. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List [email protected] http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.
